Havering councillors pondered “shields” as protection in town hall meetings
Security “sheilds” were considered by a Havering Council committee last week in the latest move to separate councillors from the public during town hall meetings.
Proposals suggest partitioning councillors sitting in the first two rows of the main council chamber from residents sitting behind, using wooden or clear plastic barricades.
The shields would be high enough to act as a barrier without obscuring views, a report to the council’s governance committee said.
And they would only be installed during certain meetings.
A review of public access to council meetings was ordered following a serious disturbance during a planning debate in October, which saw councillors allegedly threatened both verbally and physically by riled opposers.
You may also want to watch:
Since then residents have been banned from the public gallery and main chamber during full council meetings, and must watch instead from a balcony.
Cllr David Durant, of the Independent Residents’ Group (IRG), said: “The barrier would be counter-productive and more likely to incite residents during contentious meetings.”
- 1 Consultations open on rolling out school streets to 12 new sites
- 2 Man charged with multiple child exploitation offences to stand trial
- 3 Future of bus route hangs in the balance as consultation ends
- 4 Coffee shop apologises for 'mis-post' offering kitten as Christmas prize
- 5 Plane crash in Upminster sees man taken to hospital as a priority
- 6 Christmas lights switch-on to return in Romford
- 7 BHRUT 'determined to learn' after inquest finds failures in pensioner's care before her death
- 8 'Cheating surge': Dating site reveals how many people are having affairs in your area
- 9 Met Office warns of flooding risk with heavy rain set to hit London
- 10 'Accident waiting to happen': Neighbours on 'traffic carnage' around school
According to the report, the shields would also diminish the public’s ability to inappropriately “interrupt, disrupt or communicate with” councillors.
It added: “The ability of the public to appear to be able surreptitiously to contact members during quasi-judicial proceedings leaves the members, and the council, open to accusations of improper influence that would be difficult to refute.”
However, the committee - a cross party group - voted to unanimously reject the proposals on Tuesday of last week (January 17).
The IRG will call for the restoration of full public access to council chambers during all meetings at full council on February 1.