Bid to change some Havering electoral wards scrapped after complaints
The Local Government Boundaries Commission has altered its plans in Havering and announced a new consultation, after receiving hundreds of complaints. - Credit: Archant / Havering Council
Officials have dropped some planned changes to Havering’s electoral boundaries after hundreds of residents complained.
The Local Government Boundaries Commission (LGBCE) said it was no longer going ahead with some of its redrawing of the local electoral map which some residents alleged were politically motivated.
The LGBCE has ditched a planned border through Corbets Tey village, which would have assigned voters to Rainham.
Hundreds complained, some alleging the plan would aid the ruling Conservatives, as the village typically voted for resident associations.
Plans published last year included a new border through Corbets Tey, meaning hundreds of villagers would become part of Rainham & Wennington ward, instead of Upminster. The plan has now been scrapped. - Credit: LGBCE
The LGBCE has also scrapped plans to get rid of Squirrel's Heath ward and remove a council seat in Elms Park.
It has kept plans to remove a seat in Hacton, which has three resident association councillors.
You may also want to watch:
It has also amended plans to split Romford Town ward, which currently has three Conservative councillors, in two. The two new wards would have five combined seats. The ward will still be split but their names will be changed and boundaries slightly altered.
The new plan, subject to another public consultation, suggests splitting what is currently Romford Town ward into two new wards - St Edwards and St Albans. - Credit: LGBCE
More than 100 residents complained about an alleged “gerrymandering” attempt after council leader Damian White was recorded claiming he had “influenced” the council’s LGBCE submission so it was “really politically advantageous”.
Havering Council leader Damian White was recorded claiming he had been allowed to "influence" a submission to the LGBCE so it was "really politically advantageous" - but two of his Tory colleagues blocked an investigation, claiming a complaint wasn't filed quickly enough. - Credit: Havering Council
The LGBCE said it could not consider “motives” behind submissions.
Two Tory councillors blocked an investigation into the recording on a technicality.
Most Read
- 1 Letters: Breaking bad news, boundary changes, lockdown and parking
- 2 Watch police fine seven in Romford for watching TV together
- 3 British Gas engineers burn contracts at Havering Town Hall in defiance of 'sign or be fired'
- 4 Mick Norcross, The Only Way Is Essex star, has died aged 57
- 5 From the town hall: The fight against Covid-19 continues in Havering
- 6 Covid deaths increase at Queen's and King George hospitals this week
- 7 NHS nurse assaulted at east London hospital
- 8 Sadly, this isn't a funny column
- 9 Council report reveals concern that borough's Covid vaccination drive may be held back
- 10 Queen's and King George hospitals appeal for volunteers to support end of life patients
That sparked a complaint, as both men had participated in the secretly recorded meeting, yet did not declare it before deliberating over a complaint about it.
The council refused to accept the complaint, claiming the opposition was simply “dissatisfied with a decision of the council”.
A new consultation will run until March 8. Visit: https://www.lgbce.org.uk/all-reviews/greater-london/greater-london/havering
The LGBCE published the new plans days after Havering Council was ordered to comply with Freedom of Information rules, after refusing to release emails from around the time of the alleged “gerrymandering”.
The opposition requested the emails in summer but was told they were “personal”.
A requested review should have been completed within 20 working days but has now taken more than three months.
The Information Commissioner’s Office last week ordered the council to comply within 10 days.
