Havering Council denies conflicts of interest over links to ‘impartial’ investigator
- Credit: Archant
Fresh concerns have been raised over an investigation into claims that Havering’s boundary change proposals were corrupted.
Council monitoring officer John Jones said he had “appointed an officer from another local authority to undertake the investigation”.
Rainham Labour MP Jon Cruddas said it was vital the investigator had “no ties to Havering or the Tories”.
But it later emerged that the investigator was in fact Mr Jones’s boss, Daniel Fenwick.
Both men are employed by oneSource, a shared services provider run by Havering, Newham and Bexley councils.
Mr Fenwick is oneSource’s director of legal & governance and Mr Jones is his deputy. Both men also have roles as council monitoring officers – Mr Fenwick at Newham and Mr Jones at Havering.
But the Recorder has now confirmed through public records that Mr Fenwick formerly worked as Havering Council’s monitoring officer.
Opposition members have complained that his past role and ongoing position at oneSource mean he has worked closely with Havering chief executive Andrew Blake-Herbert – one of the subjects of the gerrymandering investigation.
- 1 Aldi given nod to open at former Mothercare branch in Romford
- 2 Car park killing: John Avers the 'best friend' of hitman, court hears
- 3 Aklu Plaza submits plans to convert third floor into banqueting suite
- 4 Hornchurch Japanese restaurant rejects licensing officer's advice over late opening application
- 5 Romford's South Street reacts to BBC licence fee announcement
- 6 Travel Bulletin: Havering, Redbridge, Barking and Dagenham
- 7 Construction company asks to make changes to approved 40-flat development in Romford
- 8 Man and woman arrested following Hornchurch stabbing
- 9 Rainham councillors publish 'plan B' for Beam Park transport links
- 10 Mum-of-two honoured by US president Joe Biden
Concerns have also been raised after records revealed Mr Fenwick was recommended for his oneSource job in June 2015 by five councillors, one of whom was council leader Damian White – another subject of the investigation.
Last month, the Recorder reported on a secret recording of Cllr White claiming Mr Blake-Herbert had allowed him to “influence” the council’s proposed changes to electoral ward boundaries, to make them “politically advantageous”.
He alleged Mr Blake-Herbert had agreed that a Tory-controlled committee could “filter” proposals by civil servants, “pick which one we like”, change it and then send it to Full Council for a vote.
The boundaries commission was “highly unlikely to put in the effort” to check what had happened, he added, because: “Apparently they only look at what was discussed and debated at a Full Council meeting. So there will only be one option from the council.”
Council press officers “utterly refuted” Cllr White’s recorded comments.
Mr Cruddas has formally objected to Mr Fenwick’s appointment, accusing the council of “circling the wagons”. The Havering Residents Associations, who said he was “too close” to the council.
But the council insisted Mr Fenwick would be impartial as he had “no dealings whatsoever” with the council’s boundaries review.
ROW OVER ‘GAGGING’ EMAIL
Havering Council has refused to say whether an email warning councillors against criticising the authority online was linked to recent gerrymandering allegations.
On July 29, monitoring officer John Jones emailed members to “remind” them of IT rules drawn up in July 2018.
His email drew particular attention to rule eight, which warns of sanctions for “any use of the internet... that could damage the reputation of the council”.
Former Tory councillor Bob Perry, who leaked a secret recording which has led to a formal investigation into alleged gerrymandering, said he believed the email was intended as a “threat” and a “gagging order”.
The council denied this, saying: “The email is not in any way a gagging order, nor was it sent at the request of the leader.”
But when asked what had prompted this reminder of the two-year-old rules, the council declined to comment.