Residents 'stuck' in flammable flats can't sell their homes
- Credit: Google Streetview / Darren Draper, LFB
Homeowners say they are “stuck” in their Harold Wood flats, as the discovery of flammable cladding means they cannot sell them.
Combustible cladding has been discovered on some buildings in King’s Park and investigations have been launched into others.
The Romford Recorder has seen a report by Façade Remedial Consultants, which was commissioned to “undertake a holistic fire safety review of King’s Park”.
It wrote that “the exterior of the majority of the development at this time does not comply” with government guidance.
One management company is now considering legal action against the developer, Countryside Properties.
But Countryside said: “All the buildings at King’s Park were designed and constructed in accordance with prevailing building regulations at the time of construction.”
'Burnt to smithereens'
In October 2010, Havering Council approved plans for over 800 new homes on the former Harold Wood Hospital site in Gubbins Lane, despite hundreds of objections.
- 1 'Stop being so disgusting': Hornchurch mother's outrage at delivery drivers urinating on her house
- 2 Upminster bridal boutique gives back to frontline workers with £50 wedding dresses
- 3 Hornchurch Japanese restaurant rejects licensing officer's advice over late opening application
- 4 Knife seized in Hornchurch as part of neighbourhood patrol
- 5 Aldi given nod to open at former Mothercare branch in Romford
- 6 Man found not guilty of attempted murder in Brentwood
- 7 NHS staff protest mandatory vaccinations outside Queen's Hospital
- 8 Car park killing: John Avers the 'best friend' of hitman, court hears
- 9 Romford's South Street reacts to BBC licence fee announcement
- 10 Construction company asks to make changes to approved 40-flat development in Romford
Civil servants dismissed concerns about the design, saying the development would “harmonise” with its surroundings.
“Staff are satisfied that the building would have a positive effect on the setting,” they said. All external materials would have to be “approved in writing” by the council.
Works finished in September 2018.
In September 2019, 60 firefighters were scrambled to one of the new blocks – Primula Court.
A fire had torn up the side of the four-storey building, damaging properties on every floor.
Since then, the project’s design and materials have been found wanting.
“It went up in seconds,” said taxi driver Steve Bulkan, who lives with his family in one of the affected flats.
“It started on the balcony above ours. The three flats above me were gutted. Our balcony was burnt to smithereens.”
Primula’s balconies turned out to have Aluminium Composite Material (ACM) cladding – the type used on Grenfell Tower.
“The cladding was identified as having been involved in the fire,” said the London Fire Brigade.
After the incident, firefighters “carried out a fire safety inspection of all buildings in the development” and recommended an “external wall assessment”.
Last year, inspectors gave Primula the worst possible rating – B2 - meaning remedial works were needed.
Steve’s annual insurance bill has rocketed. He had planned to re-mortgage next year, at the end of his five-year fixed-term agreement, but has been warned that the B2 rating could see his repayments upped by £400 a month.
On top of all that, he could be charged for remedial works.
“It’s stressful,” said one Primula leaseholder. In October, she received an email from building management company Wildheart, reminding residents of the danger.
“Consider the actions of throwing cigarette butts off the balcony,” it read. “It is quite feasible that a lit cigarette could be blown back toward the building, leading to a fire.”
On top of living in a flammable building, she said, residents have the “distress and worry” of not being able to sell their properties – and of potentially ending up in negative equity due to the cost of removing the cladding.
“A lot of young couples came here to one-bedroom flats and now they have babies or want to grow their families, but they’re stuck,” she said.
Next door to Primula is Baneberry Lodge. In October, it too was rated B2, due to ACM cladding around its entrances and balconies.
Lisa Petty, 40, moved into Baneberry with her sister in 2016.
Last year, they decided to sell up and buy a house. Now, she said, “that’s all on hold.”
They had already accepted an offer on their flat when the B2 rating was returned. But the sale fell through, as it was not possible to get a mortgage for a B2-rated property.
“We can’t sell it. We can’t re-mortgage it. We’re just sitting ducks, really,” she said. “We can't make any plans because we’re stuck here.”
Last month, Wildheart told Baneberry residents it was progressing “a possible legal challenge against the original developer”.
The challenge was ordered by the freeholder, E & J Estates, but the bill will be sent to the leaseholders.
If it fails, the buyers “may be required to pay toward” any remedial works, the letter added.
In the meantime, said Sarah, “You’re just waiting. It’s the most frustrating situation. We have no control over it, yet we are going to be responsible for paying for it. It’s horrible.”
L&Q, which manages 130 properties across seven other blocks at King’s Park, confirmed it was now investigating cladding on its buildings too.
Countryside Properties said fire safety was “an absolute priority”.
A spokesperson said: “We believe the wider issue of bringing historical buildings into line with current fire safety requirements needs to be addressed urgently, with developers, building owners and government sharing the responsibility.”
In February, housing secretary Robert Jenrick told Parliament that leaseholders in buildings over 18 metres with flammable cladding could apply for government aid to help pay for remedial works.
But Countryside Properties said all of the blocks in King's Park were below 18 metres, meaning leaseholders would only be eligible for "low-interest loans".
Repayments on those loans would be capped at £50 per month, said Mr Jenrick - but the loans would remain attached to the properties, potentially affecting their resale values.