Queen’s scientist disciplined after making “inappropriate” commments about GP
A senior clinical scientist at Queen’s Hospital who made “disparaging, inappropriate and unprofessional” comments about a GP on a public forum was found guilty of professional misconduct.
Stuart Jones made numerous web postings about Dr Sarah Myhill, who specialises in the treatment of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, a Health Professions Council (HPC) hearing was told last month.
Earlier he had claimed the doctor exploited vulnerable patients and reported her to the General Medical Council (GMC) in 2010.
As a result Dr Myhill was suspended for several months before her license to practise was restored but with conditions.
However, during this time Jones went on to public forum Bad Science, run by The Guardian columnist Ben Goldacre, in which he posted a number of derogatory comments about the GP and her work.
You may also want to watch:
Dr Myhill, based in Wales, told the Recorder: “[Jones] got his just deserts. The three months I was suspended were very painful. I thought the world had gone mad.
“What he wrote was very hurtful and damaging. I will do my best to restore my reputation but as the old saying goes ‘mud sticks’.”
- 1 Firefighters fight car alight in Romford
- 2 Thunderstorms, heavy rain forecast as Met Office issues yellow warnings
- 3 From 100 steps to 10,000: Romford woman tackles serious health issues by losing third of body weight
- 4 Delta variant accounts for majority of Covid cases in much of east London
- 5 BID installs wall of evergreen plants to ‘welcome people’ to Romford
- 6 Romford neighbours' outrage over ‘bonkers’ £20,000 council bill
- 7 Love Island star Kem Cetinay says Romford's Array to open 'in three weeks'
- 8 London Stadium to host mass Covid-19 jabs event for north east Londoners
- 9 'We had no idea how big he was': 11lb 4oz baby born at Romford hospital
- 10 'Stay strong': West Ham footballers send messages to fan with cancer
During the hearing, the panel said: “In acting as he did he failed to keep high standards of personal conduct as well as professional conduct and his behaviour fell short of what would be proper in the circumstances.
“This misconduct cannot, in the Panels (sic) judgement, be categorised as minor.”
But the professional body did accept Jones’s motivations were honourable: “Whilst this panel does not question [Jones’s] motivation with respect to his interest in the use of internet sites such as the Bad Science forum to discuss and debate clinical issues, it nevertheless finds his posts were disparaging, inappropriate and unprofessional.”
Jones admitted making disparaging comments on Bad Science but denied misconduct or that his fitness to practise was impaired.
Jones is allowed to continue to work but is subject of a two-year caution order.