Havering’s child rioters could be named and shamed
Youths involved in the recent rioting could be named and shamed in court under new guidelines issued by the crown prosecution service (CPS).
So far, three children from Havering, aged 11, 12, and 17, have appeared before magistrates, but it is forbidden to publish their identities.
However, following the national rioting - where it is thought around a fifth of all those involved were under 18 - the CPS is urging prosecutors to ask for restrictions to be lifted after conviction.
Home Secretary Theresa May said juveniles involved in the disturbances should be named, as part of the Government’s tough justice approach to rioters.
The guidance says there is now a strong public interest in naming young offenders where there has been:
You may also want to watch:
• significant public disorder where the public will rightly need to be satisfied that offenders have been brought to justice and there is a need to deter others;
• serious offences which have undermined the public’s confidence in the safety of their communities;
- 1 Plane crash in Upminster sees man taken to hospital as a priority
- 2 Man charged with multiple child exploitation offences to stand trial
- 3 Future of bus route hangs in the balance as consultation ends
- 4 Coffee shop apologises for 'mis-post' offering kitten as Christmas prize
- 5 BHRUT 'determined to learn' after inquest finds failures in pensioner's care before her death
- 6 Man 'wraps metal chain around woman's neck' in Hornchurch park attack
- 7 Christmas lights switch-on to return in Romford
- 8 Revealed: The most popular baby names in your area in 2020
- 9 West Ham legend Sir Trevor Brooking supports charity golf day
- 10 Construction of new Rainham Leisure centre pushed back to 2022
• hate crimes which can have a corrosive impact on the confidence of communities.
Under current law section 49 of the Children and Young Persons Act 1933 grants automatic anonymity in the youth court, while section 39 allows similar reporting restrictions to be imposed in magistrates’ court and crown court.
Currently, both restrictions can be challenged if there is a strong public interest, as was the case for the Jamie Bulger killers.